Case 2301873/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Dannique Duggan v Bex 18 Limited, trading as Beauty & Beyond — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301873/2020
- Decision date
- 22 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Apted Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dannique Duggan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningDannique Duggan brought claims against Bex 18 Limited, trading as Beauty & Beyond, at a remote hearing held via CVP on 22 March 2021 before Employment Judge Apted. The judgment records that the hearing was not objected to by the parties and that a face-to-face hearing was not practicable because of Covid-19.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim. It allowed the claimant’s claim for unpaid wages and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £17. The judgment does not set out written reasons because reasons were given orally at the hearing, and written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as a claim for unpaid wages and awarded the claimant the gross sum of £17. | Upheld | — | £17 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.