Case 2301873/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Daniel Torr v NP3 Construction Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301873/2022
- Decision date
- 13 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Daniel Torr
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Judge, sitting alone at a remote hearing, granted the Claimant’s application to amend the claim so as to add breach of contract, and also granted the application to extend time limits in respect of each claim. The Respondent did not attend the hearing.
The tribunal upheld the breach of contract claim. It found that the Respondent had failed to make pension contributions in respect of the Claimant and awarded £650 in damages. The tribunal also upheld the unauthorised deduction of wages claim, awarding £515 net in total, made up of £375 net for unpaid wages and £140 net for holiday accrued but not taken or paid on termination of employment.
The tribunal further found that the Respondent had failed to provide itemised pay statements in accordance with section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. No separate sum was recorded for that claim. The monetary awards identified in the judgment total £1,165.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal granted the amendment and found the Respondent was in breach of contract by failing to make pension contributions in respect of the Claimant. It awarded £650 in damages. | Upheld | — | £650 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim for unauthorised deduction of wages was well-founded and awarded £515 net. The award was made up of £375 net for unpaid wages and £140 net for holiday accrued but not taken or paid on termination. | Upheld | — | £515 |
| Other | The tribunal found the Respondent failed to give itemised pay statements in accordance with section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. No separate monetary award was stated for this claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,165
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.