Case 2301875/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Mercer v ESF Capital Limited Heard by video — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301875/2022
- Decision date
- 9 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Mercer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting by video before Employment Judge Corrigan on 9 January 2023, dealt with Ms M Mercer's claims against ESF Capital Limited. The judgment records that the claims of unfair dismissal, unpaid accrued holiday pay, and unpaid bonuses due on 28 February 2022 were out of time, and that the tribunal therefore did not have jurisdiction to consider them.
Each of the above complaints was dismissed on that basis. The judgment states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Held out of time; tribunal said it did not have jurisdiction to consider the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Described as unpaid accrued holiday pay; held out of time and outside the tribunal's jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Described as unpaid bonuses due on 28 February 2022; the judgment does not specify the legal label used, so this classification is an inference from the wording and the listing categories. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.