Case 2301877/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Makai v Total Synergy UK Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301877/2024
- Decision date
- 21 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London South via CVP on 19 August 2024 before Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer. The claimant, Miss V Makai, appeared in person. The respondent, Total Synergy UK Limited, did not attend. The tribunal recorded that the respondent had failed to present a response in time, so judgment was entered for the claimant under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent unlawfully deducted from the claimant’s wages in September 2023. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the total sum of £1,191.85. The judgment does not separate the award into individual components and records no other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment entered under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a response in time and did not attend the hearing. The judgment states that the respondent unlawfully deducted wages in September 2023 and orders payment of the total sum. | Upheld | — | £1,192 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,192
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.