Case 2301878/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Ajayi-Obe v Oxygen 8 Limited (in liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301878/2019
- Decision date
- 24 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Abbott Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Ajayi-Obe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined the claim under Rule 21 and found that Oxygen 8 Limited (in liquidation) had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £9,621.60 gross/net for that deduction.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,866.59. It further found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and awarded a basic award of £1,524.00.
No separate compensatory award, interest, or discrimination remedy is recorded in the judgment. The total monetary award on the face of the judgment is £14,012.19.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £9,622 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Found to have been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages awarded for the notice period. | Upheld | — | £2,867 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal unfair and awarded a basic award only. | Upheld | — | £1,524 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,012
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,524
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.