Case 2301884/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Judd v New John Retailer (Teddington) Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2301884/2022
- Decision date
- 20 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Judd
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim. It recorded that by letter dated 16 May 2024 the claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with the tribunal letter dated 6 March 2024.
The reason given was that the claimant had not provided the information requested by 13 March 2023. The tribunal found that the claimant had failed to make representations in writing, had failed to make sufficient representations, and had not requested a hearing. On that basis, the claim was struck out.
The judgment does not set out any merits findings on the underlying dispute and does not identify any remedy or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type(s); it only states that the claim was struck out because the claimant did not comply with the tribunal's earlier request for information and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.