Case 2301886/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs I Basnett v James Chilton — 2019
- Case reference
- 2301886/2019
- Decision date
- 19 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs I Basnett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Hyams-Parish recorded on 19 December 2019 that the proceedings in case 2301886/2019 were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant, Mrs I Basnett. The supplied text contains no findings on liability, no merits analysis, and no award or other remedy.
No legal reasoning is set out in the extracted judgment beyond the procedural disposition. The record therefore indicates a withdrawal rather than a substantive tribunal determination on the underlying claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The supplied judgment text only states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. The underlying claim type is taken from the GOV.UK listing context, not from the judgment text itself. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The supplied judgment text only states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. The underlying claim type is taken from the GOV.UK listing context, not from the judgment text itself. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.