Case 2301887/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Doshi v Hemmersback UK Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301887/2024
- Decision date
- 20 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Doshi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a partial strike out judgment in which Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer, sitting at London (South) via CVP on 12 September 2024, dealt only with the claimant’s unfair dismissal complaint. The tribunal struck out that complaint because there was no reasonable prospect of the claimant establishing that the Employment Tribunal had jurisdiction to hear it after it had been brought out of time.
The judgment records that the claimant’s complaint of associative direct disability discrimination was not affected by this strike out decision. No findings were made in this document on the merits of that discrimination complaint, and no monetary remedy was assessed in this judgment.
The written document also states that oral judgment was given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. As a result, the record gives the strike out outcome and its out-of-time jurisdiction basis, but does not include fuller reasoning on the underlying factual background.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the tribunal found there was no reasonable prospect of establishing jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal complaint after it was brought out of time. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.