Case 2301889/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Zielinska, FRU Volunteer For the v S-J Wood, Litigation consultant — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301889/2022
- Decision date
- 13 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Zielinska, FRU Volunteer For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was resolved by a judgment by consent at London South on 13 April 2023 before Employment Judge P Klimov sitting alone. The respondents, identified as R1 Kitrinos Healthcare (charity No. 1172586), R2 Kitrinos Healthcare Ltd and R3 Team Kitrinos Non-Profit Ltd, were ordered to pay the claimant £11,210.89 gross in full and final satisfaction of all the claimant's claims in these proceedings.
The judgment records no findings on liability, no reasons on the merits, and no breakdown of the sum between any underlying heads of claim. It is therefore a consent disposal rather than an adjudication of the substantive tribunal issues.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Judgment by consent; the judgment does not identify the underlying claim types individually or record merits findings. | Settled | — | £11,211 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,211
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.