Case 2301894/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Lovelock v New John Retailer (Teddington) Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301894/2022
- Decision date
- 19 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sudra Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Lovelock
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London South via CVP on 19 May 2023 before Employment Judge Sudra. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The written record states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
On the merits, the tribunal held that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed. It also recorded that the claimant is owed statutory redundancy pay and notice pay from the respondent. The judgment does not set out the underlying calculations or apportion any monetary award between the claims in the written record provided.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal stated that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal recorded that the claimant is owed statutory redundancy pay. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal recorded that the claimant is owed notice pay from the respondent; the written record does not split the amount between claims. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.