Case 2301898/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Elkhadraoui v Henry’s Play Café Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2301898/2019
- Decision date
- 9 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Truscott QC
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H Elkhadraoui
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs H Elkhadraoui attended the hearing; the respondent, Henry's Play Cafe Limited, did not appear and was not represented. The tribunal recorded that the respondent had ceased trading on 15 April 2019, leaving the claimed sums unpaid. After hearing the claimant explain the basis of each claim, the tribunal found the claims to be valid.
The tribunal upheld a claim for unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £2,040 gross. It also upheld a breach of contract claim in respect of notice and ordered damages of £510. In addition, the tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £765. The tribunal also upheld the claim for unpaid holiday entitlement and ordered £2,040. The total monetary award was therefore £5,355.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. | Upheld | — | £2,040 |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract finding was limited to notice pay. | Upheld | — | £510 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £765 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £2,040 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,355
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.