Case 2301906/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Reid – trade union representative (attending by telephone) For the v Ms Royle – solicitor — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301906/2022
- Decision date
- 9 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Appearances
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Reid – trade union representative (attending by telephone) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London South Employment Tribunal by CVP on 9 August 2023 before Employment Judge Martin. The claimant was represented by Mr Reid and the respondent by Ms Royle. The only outcome recorded in the judgment was on the claimant's race discrimination claim.
The tribunal stated that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claimant's claim of race discrimination. On that basis, the claim was struck out. No findings of fact, liability assessment, or remedy were recorded in the judgment provided.
The judgment does not record any monetary award or any split of compensation. It is therefore treated as a jurisdictional disposal of the race discrimination claim only, with no remedy awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal held it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claimant's race discrimination claim and struck it out. | Struck out | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.