Case 2301906/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Bugden v Action with Communities in Rural Kent Limited Richard King (Trustee of Action with Communities in Rural Kent) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301906/2023
- Decision date
- 4 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil
- Venue
- London South via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Bugden
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard by Employment Judge Khalil sitting alone at London South via CVP on 4 September 2023. The respondent did not attend and no ET3 had been entered. The judgment records that the claimant was represented by counsel and that the case concerned Mrs K Bugden’s claim against Action with Communities in Rural Kent Limited and Richard King, trustee of Action with Communities in Rural Kent.
The tribunal found that the claimant’s claim for statutory redundancy pay was well founded and succeeded. The award was made in the sum of £10,964.52 pursuant to ss.162 and 163 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The written record states that reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claim for statutory redundancy pay was well founded and succeeded. The award was made pursuant to ss.162/163 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £10,965 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,965
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.162/163 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.