Case 2301909/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Kwofie-Gill v Tesco Stores Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301909/2019
- Decision date
- 21 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Kwofie-Gill
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant failed to comply with an Unless Order dated 22 June 2021. It states that, under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, the claim therefore stands as struck out.
No merits findings are recorded and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The gov.uk listing identified Race Discrimination, but the judgment itself only states that the claim was struck out after failure to comply with an Unless Order; it does not set out the pleaded issues. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The gov.uk listing identified Unlawful Deduction from Wages, but the judgment itself only states that the claim was struck out after failure to comply with an Unless Order; it does not set out the pleaded issues. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.