Case 2301911/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Kaimesan v G8 Secure Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301911/2020
- Decision date
- 17 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barker Representatives
- Venue
- Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Kaimesan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 17 January 2023 at Croydon, Employment Judge Barker recorded a preliminary decision in Mr M Kaimesan's case against G8 Secure Limited. The tribunal found that Mr Kaimesan is a disabled person within the meaning of s6 Equality Act 2010.
The judgment states that his disability discrimination claims against the respondent may proceed. The written record notes that oral reasons were given at the hearing, but those reasons are not set out in the written judgment, and no remedy or final merits disposal is recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary ruling only: the tribunal found the claimant is a disabled person within s6 Equality Act 2010 and that his disability discrimination claims may proceed. The written record does not set out the oral reasons given at the hearing. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.