Case 2301913/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Symons v Professionals in Property Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301913/2021
- Decision date
- 7 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Symons
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal issued a strike out judgment in Mr O Symons' claim against Professionals in Property Limited. It recorded that by a letter dated 21/07/2022 the claimant was given a final opportunity to respond to earlier correspondence dated 21/12/2021 and 6/4/22, and was warned that if he did not reply within 7 days the claim would be struck out without further order.
The claimant did not respond to that letter and had not communicated with the Tribunal in any way since submitting the claim form. On that basis, the Tribunal found that the claim had not been actively pursued and struck it out. No substantive liability findings or monetary award were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type. The claim was struck out under rule 37 because the claimant did not respond to the Tribunal's letter dated 21/07/2022, had not engaged with previous correspondence dated 21/12/2021 and 6/4/22, and had not actively pursued the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.