Case 2301913/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Shakir v Foxtons Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301913/2022
- Decision date
- 19 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Shakir
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 14 September 2023, the tribunal gave Ms J Shakir an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with tribunal orders dated 14 June 2023, which had been sent to the parties on 19 June 2023, and because the claim was not being actively pursued.
The tribunal found that the claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. It also recorded that she did not attend the hearing on 14 June 2023 or 13 October 2023. The tribunal therefore struck out the claims against Foxtons Limited. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claims against the respondent were struck out collectively. It does not separate findings or remedies by cause of action. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claims against the respondent were struck out collectively. It does not separate findings or remedies by cause of action. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the claims against the respondent were struck out collectively. It does not separate findings or remedies by cause of action. | Struck out | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the claims against the respondent were struck out collectively. It does not separate findings or remedies by cause of action. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claims against the respondent were struck out collectively. It does not separate findings or remedies by cause of action. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.