Case 2301917/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Sethi v Zands Ltd T/a Martin & Co — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301917/2020
- Decision date
- 9 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Sethi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the CVP hearing on 9 April 2021 before Employment Judge Tsamados sitting alone, the tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal and redundancy payment complaints because Mr Sethi did not have a sufficient period of qualifying employment. Those claims were therefore not determined on their merits.
The complaints for damages for breach of contract in respect of notice pay and for unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of accrued holiday pay were dismissed on withdrawal. The remaining complaints, for damages for breach of contract and/or unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of unpaid commission and unpaid car mileage allowance, were found unfounded and dismissed. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed for want of sufficient period of qualifying employment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Dismissed for want of sufficient period of qualifying employment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim in respect of notice pay; dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim in respect of accrued holiday pay; dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim in respect of unpaid commission and unpaid car mileage allowance; found unfounded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim in respect of unpaid commission and unpaid car mileage allowance; found unfounded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.