Ms E Sidor v Variant Office LLP — 2026

Case reference: 2301917/2022
Decision date: 30 April 2026
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Dyal Representation
Venue: London South

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms E Sidor

Respondent

Variant Office LLP

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At the London South Employment Tribunal on 30 January 2023, Employment Judge Dyal found that Variant Office LLP had made unauthorised deductions from Ms E Sidor's wages. The tribunal awarded £7,644.03 for that claim.

The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to provide all of the written particulars required by section 2 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It awarded £544 pursuant to section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 in respect of that failure.

The judgment records a total sum payable of £8,188.03.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	The tribunal held that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages in the sum awarded.	Upheld	—	£7,644
Other	The tribunal found that the respondent failed to provide all of the written particulars required by s.2 Employment Rights Act 1996 and awarded £544 pursuant to s.38 Employment Act 2002.	Upheld	—	£544

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £8,188; across all upheld claims

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.