Case 2301918/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Ocran v Primary Care Partners Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301918/2021
- Decision date
- 8 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Clarke Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Ocran
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 8 December 2022 before Employment Judge L Clarke, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel. The judgment records that the claimant's claims for wrongful dismissal (notice pay), holiday pay, discrimination on the grounds of sex, and discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.
No liability findings or remedy assessment are recorded in the judgment. The decision is limited to the procedural disposal of the claims following withdrawal, and it does not include any determination of the merits of the pleaded complaints.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Claim described as wrongful dismissal (notice pay); dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.