Case 2301923/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Parker v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2301923/2019
- Decision date
- 6 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyde Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Parker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.
No substantive findings on the merits of the claims or any remedy were made in the supplied judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment dismisses the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim. The specific pleaded claims are not detailed in the judgment text; this classification follows the listing category/hint and is therefore lower confidence. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment dismisses the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim. The specific pleaded claims are not detailed in the judgment text; this classification follows the listing category/hint and is therefore lower confidence. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment dismisses the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim. The specific pleaded claims are not detailed in the judgment text; this classification follows the listing category/hint and is therefore lower confidence. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment dismisses the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim. The specific pleaded claims are not detailed in the judgment text; this classification follows the listing category/hint and is therefore lower confidence. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment dismisses the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim. The specific pleaded claims are not detailed in the judgment text; this classification follows the listing category/hint and is therefore lower confidence. | Withdrawn |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.