Case 2301925/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Hall v Dan Armah / Royal Mail Group Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301925/2020
- Decision date
- 1 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Hall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 1 March 2021 before Employment Judge Martin, the tribunal recorded that the correct name of the respondent was Royal Mail Group Limited. The claimant, Mrs Hall, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mrs K Hall, solicitor.
The only substantive order recorded in the extracted judgment is that the proceedings were dismissed against Dan Armah. The text does not set out any findings on the underlying disability discrimination or unlawful deduction from wages issues listed in the case metadata, and it does not record any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | At the preliminary hearing on 1 March 2021, the tribunal determined that the correct name of the respondent was Royal Mail Group Limited. The proceedings were dismissed against Dan Armah; no substantive merits decision is recorded in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.