Case 2301931/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301931/2023
- Decision date
- 31 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer Appearances
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Did not attend For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe public preliminary hearing proceeded in the claimant's absence after the Tribunal considered that she knew of the hearing, had not applied to postpone it, and that her statement and evidence were before the Tribunal. The sole issue was whether the claimant met the definition of disability under section 6 Equality Act 2010 at the time relevant to her disability discrimination claims.
The Tribunal accepted that the claimant had a significant rash from November 2022 and symptoms of depression during the relevant period, and that these had adverse effects on socialising which were more than minor or trivial. It did not find that the claimant had proved chronic depression, and found it more likely that she had an acute episode of depression linked to bereavement.
The Tribunal concluded that the claimant had not shown that the substantial adverse effects were long-term or likely to last for at least 12 months when assessed at the relevant time. It therefore found that she was not disabled for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 at the relevant time, and dismissed the disability discrimination claims. The constructive dismissal claim was not affected by the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment dismisses the claimant's disability discrimination claims because she had not satisfied the Tribunal that she was disabled at any relevant time. The constructive dismissal claim was expressly unaffected by this judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
13 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Morgan v Staffordshire University
- Tesco Stores Limited v Tennant
- Guidance on matters to be taken into Account in Determining Questions Relating to the Definition of Disability
- Leonard v Southern Derbyshire Chamber of Commerce
- Goodwin v Patent Office
- s212 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
- Paterson v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
- McDougall v Richmond Adult Community College
- SCA Packaging Limited v Boyle
- Nissa v Waverly Education Foundation Limited
- All Answers Ltd v W
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.