Case 2301933/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Baptiste v The Healthy Living Platform Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301933/2021
- Decision date
- 6 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Baptiste
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a default judgment under Rule 21. It found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered the respondent to pay £2,800 gross in damages.
It further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,808.09 gross. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to provide a written statement of initial employment particulars and ordered payment of £1,400, described as two weeks’ pay.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for breach of contract in respect of notice, stated to be £2,800 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,800 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay £2,808.09 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,808 |
| Other | The respondent failed to provide a written statement of initial employment particulars and was ordered to pay £1,400, described as 2 weeks’ pay. | Upheld | — | £1,400 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,008
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.