Case 2301933/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Sheikh v ProsAssist Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2301933/2022
- Decision date
- 12 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Representation Claimant
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Sheikh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs M Sheikh brought claims against ProsAssist Limited for unauthorised deductions from wages and breach of contract in relation to notice pay. The hearing was by telephone on 12 December 2022, with the respondent absent and the claimant appearing in person.
The Employment Tribunal dismissed both claims. It held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear them because the claim form had not been presented within the applicable time limit, and it found that it was reasonably practicable for the claims to have been presented in time.
No monetary award was made. The judgment records only the jurisdictional dismissal of the wage deduction and breach of contract claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction: the claim form was not presented within the time limit, and it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed in relation to notice pay for the same reason: the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction because the claim form was not presented within the time limit, where it was reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.