Case 2301935/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Pearmain v R & R Family Pubs Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301935/2024
- Decision date
- 7 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ramsden Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Pearmain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 11 February 2024. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The listed hearing for 04 July 2024 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered the respondent to pay Miss L Pearmain £166.00 gross.
The judgment records a total sum payable of £166.00. It also states that the claimant must account to HMRC for any sums owed by her in respect of any payment received pursuant to the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £166.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £166 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £166
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.