Case 2301937/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Williams v UU Services Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301937/2023
- Decision date
- 15 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McCann Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Williams
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge McCann, sitting alone at London South Employment Tribunal on 15 December 2023, upheld Mr S Williams's claim for unauthorised deductions from wages against UU Services Limited (in voluntary liquidation). The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant the full amount of wages due for September and November 2022 and January 2023.
The judgment ordered the respondent to pay £1,843.99, described as the total net sum deducted. The tribunal also noted that, on an assumption of a 20% marginal rate of income tax, that figure would amount to £2,304.99 on a gross basis. No other claim type or separate remedy was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant the full amount of wages due for September and November 2022 and January 2023. The written judgment records the award as the total net sum deducted; it adds that, on an assumption of a 20% marginal tax rate, this would be £2,304.99 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,844 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,844
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.