Case 2301957/2023 · Employment Tribunal
John Grimshaw v Openreach Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2301957/2023
- Decision date
- 27 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beckett Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
John Grimshaw
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case remotely at London South ET on 21 February 2025 before Employment Judge Beckett. The claimant, John Grimshaw, appeared in person and the respondent, Openreach Limited, was represented by Ms Jervis with paralegals Ms Brookes and Ms Khan.
The tribunal held that both the unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal complaints were not presented within the applicable time limit. It further found that it was reasonably practicable to present them in time.
On that basis, both claims were dismissed. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit and it was reasonably practicable to do so. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Dismissed because the complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit and it was reasonably practicable to do so. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.