Case 2301968/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Z. Carty v Razors and Blades Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301968/2021
- Decision date
- 31 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A. Beale Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Z. Carty
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant's effective date of termination was 4 August 2020, when she was told that her contract was being terminated. Although the claims were presented outside the ordinary three-month time limits, the tribunal extended time because it found that the claimant did not clearly understand that she had been dismissed, had not been told of her rights, and was affected by the uncertainty caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. It found that she acted promptly once she became aware of the position in May 2021 and that it was not reasonably practicable for her to bring the claims in time.
On the merits, the tribunal upheld unfair dismissal because the respondent did not prove a fair reason for dismissal. It rejected the redundancy payment claim because it could not find, on the balance of probabilities, that the dismissal was by reason of redundancy. It upheld wrongful dismissal because the claimant was entitled to two weeks' statutory notice, although the judge said no separate contractual notice award could be made. It also upheld the claim for arrears of wages for 23 March 2020 to 4 August 2020 and the holiday pay claim; for wages, the tribunal accepted that the claimant was not paid during that period and calculated pay by reference to hourly rates of £8.21 and £8.72 for a six-hour working week.
The tribunal awarded a basic award of £104.64, a compensatory award for unfair dismissal, an award for loss of statutory rights of £52.32, arrears of wages of £1,005.09, and holiday pay of £331.81, making a total gross award of £2,719.64. The written reasons contain a clerical inconsistency on the compensatory award figure: paragraph 3(c) states £1,255.78, but paragraphs 8 and 43 and the total award are consistent with £1,225.78. The tribunal also recorded that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 applied to the award under section 123 ERA 1996.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Time was extended because the tribunal found it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim in time; the written reasons contain a clerical inconsistency on the compensatory award figure, with paragraph 3(c) stating £1,255.78 but paragraphs 8 and 43 and the total award aligning with £1,225.78. | Upheld | — | £1,383 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal could not find on the balance of probabilities that the termination was by reason of redundancy. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to two weeks' statutory notice; the judgment says this sum was already included in the compensatory award and did not need to be paid separately. | Upheld | — | £105 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded for unpaid wages from 23 March 2020 to 4 August 2020, calculated by reference to hourly rates of £8.21 and then £8.72 for a 6-hour working week. | Upheld | — | £1,005 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay was awarded for the two-year period before the claim form, applying the tribunal's view of the series of deductions and the two-year limit in s.123(4A) ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £332 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,720
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £105
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,226
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
9 references- s.111(2) and (2A) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Dedman v British Building and Engineering Appliances Ltd [1974] ICR 53
- s.23(2) and (3) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.123(4A) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland v Agnew [2023] UKSC 33
- s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulations 13 and 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996
- rule 21(3) of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.