Case 2301971/2016 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Nielsen-Von Reitzig v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2017
- Case reference
- 2301971/2016
- Decision date
- 15 March 2017
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hildebrand Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Nielsen-Von Reitzig
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant withdrew complaints of age discrimination, automatic unfair dismissal on health and safety grounds, and unpaid holiday pay. Those complaints were dismissed following the withdrawals.
The claimant's remaining claim of unfair dismissal was not determined in this judgment. The judgment stated that it would proceed to a hearing on 2 and 3 October 2017.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment states the complaint of age discrimination was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment describes this as automatic unfair dismissal on health and safety grounds and states it was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the complaint for unpaid holiday pay was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.