Case 2301986/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Lim v Malcolm Hollis LLP — 2019
- Case reference
- 2301986/2018
- Decision date
- 31 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anne Martin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Lim
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal record states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by Mr K Lim. The judgment does not contain any findings on the merits of the underlying unfair dismissal, race discrimination, or religion or belief discrimination allegations.
No liability findings or remedy award are recorded in the judgment. Employment Judge Anne Martin signed the judgment on 31 January 2019.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; no merits findings are recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; no merits findings are recorded. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; no merits findings are recorded. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.