Case 2301986/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Fernandez Breis v Weaveworks Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) Also sent to: The Secretary of State for Business & Trade (as statutory guarantor) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301986/2024
- Decision date
- 20 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ramsden Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Fernandez Breis
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr E Fernandez Breis's employment ended on 31 December 2023 and that he had been paid for work done up to that date, so his complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages for January 2024 was dismissed. It also recorded a separate pension-contributions complaint, which had been paid after presentation and was dismissed upon the claimant's withdrawal.
On dismissal and holiday pay, the tribunal held that the claimant was wrongfully dismissed without notice or payment in lieu of notice and that he was contractually entitled to one month's notice. It found a gross wrongful dismissal entitlement of £11,666.67, noted that the Secretary of State had already paid £643.00 gross of that amount, and recorded the balance of £11,023.67 gross as owed by the respondent. It further found that he had accrued but not taken four days of annual leave worth £2,156 gross, of which £459.29 had been paid by the Secretary of State, leaving £1,696.71 gross owed by the respondent.
The tribunal then addressed collective consultation. It found that the respondent had failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 in relation to 71 redundancies at a single establishment on 31 December 2023, and that the claimant was entitled to pursue the complaint under section 189 because there was no recognised trade union or employee representatives. It accepted that there had been some partial compliance and only minimal consultation, but still concluded that it was just and equitable to make a protective award of 50 days' pay for the claimant. The judgment also recorded that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 applied only to the protective award, with a protected period from 29 December 2023 to 16 February 2024.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant's employment ended on 31 December 2023 and that he had been paid for work done up to that date, so the January 2024 wage complaint was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found he was wrongfully dismissed without notice or payment in lieu of notice and was contractually entitled to one month's notice. It found a gross entitlement of £11,666.67, noted that the Secretary of State had already paid £643.00 gross, and recorded the balance of £11,023.67 gross as owed by the respondent. | Upheld | — | £11,024 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that at termination the claimant had accrued but not taken four days of annual leave worth £2,156 gross in total. It recorded that £459.29 had been paid by the Secretary of State and that the balance of £1,696.71 gross was owed by the respondent. | Upheld | — | £1,697 |
| Breach of contract | This complaint concerned unpaid pension contributions. The tribunal recorded that the contributions had since been paid and dismissed the complaint upon its withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal found a failure to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 in relation to 71 redundancies at a single establishment on 31 December 2023. It found there had been some partial compliance and only minimal consultation, and made a protective award of 50 days' pay for the claimant; no sterling figure was stated in the judgment text. |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- s.189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- Susie Radin Ltd v GMB and others [2004] ICR 893
- Amicus v GMB Tooling Ltd (in administration) [2005] IRLR 638
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.