Case 2301988/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Wedderburn v Digital Mauve Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2301988/2020
- Decision date
- 5 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sekhon Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Wedderburn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at London South on 3 November 2021 before Employment Judge Sekhon, with Mr Wedderburn appearing in person and Digital Mauve Ltd represented by Mr Harris in person. The written judgment records a single substantive finding: the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant’s wages.
The tribunal ordered Digital Mauve Ltd to pay Mr Wedderburn the gross sum of £1,723.06 in respect of the amount unlawfully deducted. No further reasoning, legal test, or split of the award is set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,723.06. No separate breakdown of the award was given. | Upheld | — | £1,723 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,723
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.