Case 2302006/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Thakkar v A Team Ph Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2302006/2020
- Decision date
- 23 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Braganza Appearances
- Venue
- By CVP at London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Thakkar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by CVP at London South Employment Tribunal on 23 July 2021 before Employment Judge Braganza. The claimant, Mr S Thakkar, appeared in person and the respondent did not appear. The judgment was issued under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal recorded that the claim for breach of contract and the claim for unauthorized deduction from wages succeeded. It ordered A Team PH Ltd to pay Mr Thakkar £538.12. The short judgment does not set out further reasoning, nor does it allocate the sum between the two successful claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim for breach of contract succeeds, but it records only a single total sum of £538.12 for the combined judgment and does not split the award by claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim for unauthorized deduction from wages succeeds, but it records only a single total sum of £538.12 for the combined judgment and does not split the award by claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £538
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.