Case 2302013/2023 · Employment Tribunal
James Pollard v Southeast Access Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2302013/2023
- Decision date
- 22 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N Wilson
- Panel members
- S Townsend, R Effeny
Parties
2 namedClaimant
James Pollard
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at London South by public video hearing on 20, 21 and 22 May 2025 before Employment Judge N Wilson with two non-legal members. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The judgment records that the complaint of automatic unfair dismissal for making protected disclosures was not well-founded and was dismissed. It also records that the complaints of direct sex discrimination and wrongful dismissal notice pay were not well-founded and were dismissed. Reasons were given orally, and no written reasons are included in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The written judgment describes this as a complaint of automatic unfair dismissal for making protected disclosures. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The written judgment describes this as wrongful dismissal notice pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.