Case 2302026/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Arcin v Impact Food Group Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2302026/2020
- Decision date
- 2 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Arcin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr F Arcin's unfair dismissal claim. It recorded that by letter dated 27 July 2020 the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because he had been employed for less than two years.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Andrews held that the unfair dismissal claim should be struck out.
The judgment notes that the hearing fixed for 5 May 2021 remained listed to deal with the claim for notice pay, and that that hearing was extended to two hours. No remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant had been employed for less than two years and did not make sufficient representations, or request a hearing, after being given the opportunity to do so by letter dated 27 July 2020. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.