Case 2302031/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Emese Sram v Bionical Solutions Ltd Heard — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302031/2022
- Decision date
- 2 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pritchard Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Emese Sram
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a video hearing on 2 May 2023 before Employment Judge Pritchard, the tribunal recorded the judgment in the case of Ms Emese Sram v Bionical Solutions Ltd. The operative order states that the claims under this case number were dismissed upon withdrawal.
The claims listed in the judgment were unfair dismissal, sex discrimination, equal pay, breach of contract, and other payments. The supplied text contains no substantive findings on liability, no reasons explaining any merits-based outcome, and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that this claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that this claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Equal pay | The judgment states that this claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that this claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The judgment records this as an 'other payments' claim and states that it was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.