Case 2302037/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Omoruyi v Sonia Heyway Care Agency Ltd Heard by video — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302037/2020
- Decision date
- 4 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Omoruyi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 4 November 2022, the case was heard by video before Employment Judge Corrigan, with Mr J Omoruyi appearing in person and no appearance for Sonia Heyway Care Agency Ltd. The tribunal entered a Rule 21 judgment.
The tribunal found that Mr Omoruyi had been wrongfully dismissed and awarded him £340 in respect of notice pay. It also found that the respondent had not paid him for 5 days' accrued holiday and ordered payment of £340, subject to any tax and national insurance due.
The tribunal further found that the claim of unlawful deduction of wages was well founded and ordered payment of £68.80, also subject to any tax and national insurance due. The awards stated in the judgment total £748.80 before any tax or national insurance treatment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Awarded compensation of £340 for notice pay. | Upheld | — | £340 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay 5 days' accrued holiday and ordered £340, subject to any tax and national insurance due. | Upheld | — | £340 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim found well founded; £68.80 ordered, subject to any tax and national insurance due. | Upheld | — | £69 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £749
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.