Case 2302040/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. C. Pyne v Royal Mail Group Limited and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2302040/2022
- Decision date
- 25 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sudra
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Mr. Turley, Ms. Christofi
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr. C. Pyne
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at London South from 22 to 25 October 2024 before Employment Judge Sudra sitting with non-legal members Mr. Turley and Ms. Christofi. The claimant appeared in person and the respondents were represented by Mr. Burgess, a paralegal.
The written judgment records the outcome only: the claimant's claims are dismissed. It states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment states only that the Claimant's claims are dismissed. The disability discrimination classification is supported by the supplied gov.uk listing category, but the extracted judgment text does not set out the specific allegations or reasons. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.