Case 2302043/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Daniels v London General Transport Services Limited t/a Go Ahead London — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302043/2021
- Decision date
- 27 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self
- Panel members
- Ms B Leverton, Mr R Singh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Daniels
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Self sitting with Ms B Leverton and Mr R Singh on 27 June 2022. The claimant, Mr S Daniels, pursued a whistleblowing detriment complaint against London General Transport Services Ltd t/a Go Ahead London.
The tribunal dismissed the claim. It found that the claimant’s allegation that he was subjected to a detriment because he had made a protected disclosure was not well-founded. The judgment also states, for the avoidance of doubt, that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure on 19 March 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The tribunal held that the claimant’s claim that he was subjected to a detriment on the ground that he had made a protected disclosure was not well-founded. It also stated, for the avoidance of doubt, that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure on 19 March 2021. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.