Case 2302047/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Mr I Turner v Tower Demolition (Holdings) Ltd1 (company number 07747685) — 2023

Case reference: 2302047/2022
Decision date: 1 March 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Wright Representation
Venue: Initially in person in

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr I Turner

Respondent

Tower Demolition (Holdings) Ltd1 (company number 07747685)

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Employment Judge Wright recorded that Mr I Turner's unfair dismissal claim and his claim of automatic unfair dismissal under Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996 were both well-founded and succeeded. The extract does not set out the tribunal's factual reasoning for those findings; it records the liability outcome only.

The tribunal ordered Tower Demolition (Holdings) Ltd to pay a total award of £121,601.88, grossed up to allow for tax at the marginal rate of 20%. The judgment also notes that the claimant applied for written reasons under Rule 63(2), and that reasons would be provided separately.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment states that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim was well-founded and succeeded.	Upheld	—	—
Other	The judgment states that the claimant's claim of automatic unfair dismissal under Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded and succeeded, but the extract does not identify the specific statutory ground beyond that description.	Upheld	—	—

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £121,602; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.