Case 2302060/2018 · Employment Tribunal

Mr M McQuillan First v DRR Building Services Limited (a dissolved company) Second Respondent: Millbrooke Group Limited Third Respondent: Daniel Green — 2018

Case reference: 2302060/2018
Decision date: 14 November 2018
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Baron Dated

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr M McQuillan First

Respondent

DRR Building Services Limited (a dissolved company) Second Respondent: Millbrooke Group Limited Third Respondent: Daniel Green

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal struck out the claim as against the First Respondent, DRR Building Services Limited, after notifying the Claimant on 13 September 2018 of the proposal to make that judgment under rule 37(2) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The Claimant did not provide representations against strike-out and did not request a hearing to consider the proposed judgment.

The tribunal held that the claim did not have any reasonable prospect of success. No substantive findings on liability were made, and the judgment records no monetary award or remedy. The decision was signed by Employment Judge Baron and dated 14 November 2018.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment struck out the claim as against the First Respondent under rule 37(2) after the tribunal concluded that it had no reasonable prospect of success. The underlying substantive claim type was not specified in the judgment text.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.