Case 2302066/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Daniels (on behalf of all Claimants) For the v Pebbles Hospitality Ltd (In administration) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2302066/2020
- Decision date
- 14 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Daniels (on behalf of all Claimants) For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not appear and no response was received. The tribunal found that Pebbles Hospitality Ltd (in administration) had made unlawful deductions from the wages of the claimants and ordered payment of the sums set out in the schedule, totalling £42,235.32, subject to deductions for tax required by law.
The schedule listed 22 claimants and set out individual awards for unpaid wages, holiday pay, notice pay and redundancy pay. The judgment is brief and records the award only; it does not set out a detailed reasons section or separate liability findings beyond the unlawful deductions finding.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Respondent did not appear and no response was received. The judgment expressly finds unlawful deductions from wages and sets out individual schedule amounts for the claimants; it does not separately explain the legal basis for the notice pay and redundancy pay figures in the schedule. | Upheld | — | £42,235 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £42,235
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.