Case 2302070/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Leeks v Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 2302070/2019
- Decision date
- 6 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Freer Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Leeks
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 6 March 2020 before Employment Judge Freer, the Tribunal recorded that the Respondent's application was successful and that it had no jurisdiction to consider Mrs N Leeks' claims in the linked proceedings 2302070/2019 and 2302071/2019. No substantive findings on liability were made, and the judgment does not record any monetary remedy because the claims did not proceed to a merits determination.
The written judgment states that the reasons for the decision were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the judgment being sent to the parties. The short judgment itself does not set out the factual or legal basis for the jurisdiction decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim type inferred from the linked gov.uk listing/title; the short written judgment itself only records that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider the Claimant's claims. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Whistleblowing | Claim type inferred from the linked gov.uk listing/title; the short written judgment itself only records that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider the Claimant's claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.