Case 2302075/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Philpotts v Caatalyst UK Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2302075/2019
- Decision date
- 15 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Philpotts
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because the respondent did not attend. The claimant, Mr A Philpotts, appeared in person before Employment Judge Wright at London South on 15 October 2019.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claim for unlawful deductions from wages succeeded. It awarded the gross sum of £1,515.05 against Caatalyst UK Ltd.
The judgment states that the claimant must account to HMRC. No separate findings, additional heads of loss, or further claims are set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment was granted under Rule 21 after the respondent did not attend. The tribunal held that the claimant's claim for unlawful deductions from wages succeeded and awarded the gross sum of £1,515.05, to be paid by the respondent. The claimant was directed to account to HMRC. | Upheld | — | £1,515 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,515
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.