Case 2302081/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Nicola Wright v Newjohn Retailer (walton) Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302081/2022
- Decision date
- 17 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Nicola Wright
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 20 June 2022 and the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that Nicola Wright was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £712.50 gross. It also found that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,068.75 gross.
The total sum payable was £1,781.25 gross. The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any figures owed to HMRC in respect of tax or national insurance contributions.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment; the tribunal found the dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded gross damages of £712.50. | Upheld | — | £713 |
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment; the tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a gross redundancy payment of £1,068.75. | Upheld | — | £1,069 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,781
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.