Case 2302086/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J. Huggett v Sprint Engineering & Lubricants Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2302086/2020
- Decision date
- 30 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J. Huggett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote hearing before Employment Judge P Klimov sitting alone on 19 April 2021, the tribunal recorded that Mrs J. Huggett resigned from Sprint Engineering & Lubricants Ltd and was not dismissed by the respondent. The judgment states that the hearing was conducted by video and that the parties did not object to that format.
Because the tribunal found there had been no dismissal, the claimant's claims for unfair dismissal, notice pay, and redundancy payment all failed and were dismissed. The judgment does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant resigned and was not dismissed by the respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to the claim as 'notice pay'; it failed because the tribunal found the claimant resigned and was not dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Dismissed on the tribunal's finding that the claimant resigned and was not dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.