Case 2302087/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Ali v Left Turn Limited (in Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2302087/2023
- Decision date
- 8 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Ali
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs N Ali brought an unauthorised deduction from wages claim against Left Turn Limited (in liquidation). The hearing took place on 8 January 2024 at London South (Croydon) via CVP before Employment Judge Wright. The claimant did not attend. The respondent was represented by a representative from the liquidator and did not defend the claim.
The tribunal found that the claim of an unauthorised deduction from wages in the sum of £2,021.25 gross was well-founded and succeeded. No further factual findings, liability analysis, or breakdown of the sum were set out in the extracted judgment text.
The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The extracted text also contains a garbled final sentence about the claimant and HMRC, so no additional remedy detail can safely be extracted beyond the gross amount recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent did not defend the claim and that the claimant's unauthorised deduction from wages claim for £2,021.25 gross was well-founded and succeeded. The final sentence in the extracted text is garbled ('The claimant it to account to HMRC'), so no further remedy breakdown is given. | Upheld | — | £2,021 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,021
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.