Case 2302112/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Wildeboer v YOLO London Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302112/2020
- Decision date
- 21 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Wildeboer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal struck out Mr D Wildeboer’s claim against Yolo London Ltd. The tribunal said that by letters dated 22 March 2021 and 20 July 2022 it had given the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal ordered that the claim be struck out.
No substantive liability issues were determined and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make sufficient representations, in response to letters dated 22 March 2021 and 20 July 2022, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.