Case 2302131/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Earwaker v Greensleeves care — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302131/2021
- Decision date
- 1 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Earwaker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal struck out the claim. The reasons record that, by a letter dated 15 December 2022, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 15 December 2022 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Martin held that the claim should be struck out. The extracted judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying allegations or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive causes of action in the extracted text. It records that the claim was struck out after the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 15 December 2022 and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.